This Blog exists for the collective benefit of all geometry students. While the posts are specific to Mr. Chamberlain's class, any and all "geometricians" are welcome. The more specific your question (including your own attempts to answer it) the better.
Well, the first congruence I saw was tri-MRS cong tri-NSR, since the angles opposite the cong sides are cong and the midpoints gave us the cong sides of seg-SM and seg-RN. You can CPCTC your brains out from there. That's just one way to answer your question, I guess. (Did that help?)
As for WYSIWYG, try a) asking your parents b) googling it standalone and (for fun) c) google it with 'geraldine' as the next word. There's probably a few good youtube videos out there...
Haha good one Mr Chamberlain. I had trouble with page 142 number 13, the compactness (is that a real word) of the diagram sorta syched me out. I also didnt understand what the problem was asking for on page 144 number 9.
Dare I ask what WYSIWYG is?
ReplyDelete#10 was the most fun. Is segment RM congruent with segment NS? It seems like it is, but what is the reason?
Well, the first congruence I saw was tri-MRS cong tri-NSR, since the angles opposite the cong sides are cong and the midpoints gave us the cong sides of seg-SM and seg-RN. You can CPCTC your brains out from there. That's just one way to answer your question, I guess. (Did that help?)
ReplyDeleteAs for WYSIWYG, try a) asking your parents b) googling it standalone and (for fun) c) google it with 'geraldine' as the next word. There's probably a few good youtube videos out there...
WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET
ReplyDeleteHaha good one Mr Chamberlain. I had trouble with page 142 number 13, the compactness (is that a real word) of the diagram sorta syched me out. I also didnt understand what the problem was asking for on page 144 number 9.
ReplyDeleteOh sorry, the anon one was supposed to be Napoleon aka Chisu.
ReplyDeleteWOW im not surprised... anywaysss i think i possibly left my gb in ur classroom do you know?
ReplyDeleteyup (GB)
ReplyDelete